Full metadata record

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorChoi, Dennis W.-
dc.contributor.authorArmitage, Robert-
dc.contributor.authorBrady, Linda S.-
dc.contributor.authorCoetzee, Timothy-
dc.contributor.authorFisher, William-
dc.contributor.authorHyman, Steven-
dc.contributor.authorPande, Atul-
dc.contributor.authorPaul, Steven-
dc.contributor.authorPotter, William-
dc.contributor.authorRoin, Benjamin-
dc.contributor.authorSherer, Todd-
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-20T08:31:49Z-
dc.date.available2024-01-20T08:31:49Z-
dc.date.created2021-09-02-
dc.date.issued2014-11-05-
dc.identifier.issn0896-6273-
dc.identifier.urihttps://pubs.kist.re.kr/handle/201004/126131-
dc.description.abstractSeveral large pharmaceutical companies have selectively downsized their neuroscience research divisions, reflecting a growing view that developing drugs to treat brain diseases is more difficult and often more time-consuming and expensive than developing drugs for other therapeutic areas, and thus represents a weak area for investment. These withdrawals reduce global neuroscience translational capabilities and pose a serious challenge to society's interests in ameliorating the impact of nervous system diseases. While the path forward ultimately lies in improving understandings of disease mechanisms, many promising therapeutic approaches have already been identified, and rebalancing the underlying risk/reward calculus could help keep companies engaged in making CNS drugs. One way to do this that would not require upfront funding is to change the policies that regulate market returns for the most-needed breakthrough drugs. The broader neuroscience community including clinicians and patients should convene to develop and advocate for such policy changes.-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.publisherCELL PRESS-
dc.subjectRESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT-
dc.subjectACCELERATED APPROVAL-
dc.subjectBRAND-NAME-
dc.subjectTRENDS-
dc.subjectCOST-
dc.subjectPRODUCTIVITY-
dc.subjectCOMPETITION-
dc.subjectINNOVATION-
dc.subjectDISORDERS-
dc.subjectDISEASES-
dc.titleMedicines for the Mind: Policy-Based "Pull'' Incentives for Creating Breakthrough CNS Drugs-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.neuron.2014.10.027-
dc.description.journalClass1-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationNEURON, v.84, no.3, pp.554 - 563-
dc.citation.titleNEURON-
dc.citation.volume84-
dc.citation.number3-
dc.citation.startPage554-
dc.citation.endPage563-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscie-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscopus-
dc.identifier.wosid000344168100009-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-84912062220-
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategoryNeurosciences-
dc.relation.journalResearchAreaNeurosciences & Neurology-
dc.type.docTypeReview-
dc.subject.keywordPlusRESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT-
dc.subject.keywordPlusACCELERATED APPROVAL-
dc.subject.keywordPlusBRAND-NAME-
dc.subject.keywordPlusTRENDS-
dc.subject.keywordPlusCOST-
dc.subject.keywordPlusPRODUCTIVITY-
dc.subject.keywordPlusCOMPETITION-
dc.subject.keywordPlusINNOVATION-
dc.subject.keywordPlusDISORDERS-
dc.subject.keywordPlusDISEASES-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorbrain diseases-
dc.subject.keywordAuthortranslational-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorMedicine-
dc.subject.keywordAuthornervous-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorCNS Drug-
dc.subject.keywordAuthortherapeutic-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorpharmaceutical company-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorpolicy-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorneuroscience-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorbreakthrough drug-
Appears in Collections:
KIST Article > 2014
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Export
RIS (EndNote)
XLS (Excel)
XML

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

BROWSE