Full metadata record

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorKim, Do-Hyung-
dc.contributor.authorYoo, Jong-Chan-
dc.contributor.authorHwang, Bo-Ram-
dc.contributor.authorYang, Jung-Seok-
dc.contributor.authorBaek, Kitae-
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-20T10:00:39Z-
dc.date.available2024-01-20T10:00:39Z-
dc.date.created2021-09-05-
dc.date.issued2014-05-
dc.identifier.issn0944-1344-
dc.identifier.urihttps://pubs.kist.re.kr/handle/201004/126821-
dc.description.abstractIn this study, an environmental assessment on an electrokinetic (EK) system for the remediation of a multimetal-contaminated real site was conducted using a green and sustainable remediation (GSR) tool. The entire EK process was classified into major four phases consisting of remedial investigations (RIs), remedial action construction (RAC), remedial action operation (RAO), and long-term monitoring (LTM) for environmental assessment. The environmental footprints, including greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, total energy used, air emissions of criteria pollutants, such as NOx, SOx, and PM10, and water consumption, were calculated, and the relative contribution in each phase was analyzed in the environmental assessment. In the RAC phase, the relative contribution of the GHG emissions, total energy used, and PM10 emissions were 77.3, 67.6, and 70.4 %, respectively, which were higher than those of the other phases because the material consumption and equipment used for system construction were high. In the RAO phase, the relative contributions of water consumption and NOx and SOx emissions were 94.7, 85.2, and 91.0 %, respectively, which were higher than those of the other phases, because the water and electricity consumption required for system operation was high. In the RIs and LTM phases, the environmental footprints were negligible because the material and energy consumption was less. In conclusion, the consumable materials and electrical energy consumption might be very important for GSR in the EK remediation process, because the production of consumable materials and electrical energy consumption highly affects the GHG emissions, total energy used, and air emissions such as NOx and SOx.-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.publisherSPRINGER HEIDELBERG-
dc.subjectLIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT-
dc.subjectSALINE SOIL-
dc.subjectLCA-
dc.subjectRESTORATION-
dc.subjectSCALE-
dc.subjectPB-
dc.subjectTECHNOLOGIES-
dc.subjectALTERNATIVES-
dc.subjectEXTRACTION-
dc.subjectIMPACTS-
dc.titleEnvironmental assessment on electrokinetic remediation of multimetal-contaminated site: a case study-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s11356-014-2597-1-
dc.description.journalClass1-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, v.21, no.10, pp.6751 - 6758-
dc.citation.titleENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH-
dc.citation.volume21-
dc.citation.number10-
dc.citation.startPage6751-
dc.citation.endPage6758-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscie-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscopus-
dc.identifier.wosid000336314900047-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-84900839413-
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategoryEnvironmental Sciences-
dc.relation.journalResearchAreaEnvironmental Sciences & Ecology-
dc.type.docTypeArticle; Proceedings Paper-
dc.subject.keywordPlusLIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT-
dc.subject.keywordPlusSALINE SOIL-
dc.subject.keywordPlusLCA-
dc.subject.keywordPlusRESTORATION-
dc.subject.keywordPlusSCALE-
dc.subject.keywordPlusPB-
dc.subject.keywordPlusTECHNOLOGIES-
dc.subject.keywordPlusALTERNATIVES-
dc.subject.keywordPlusEXTRACTION-
dc.subject.keywordPlusIMPACTS-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorEnvironmental assessment-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorElectrokinetic remediation-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorMultimetal-contaminated site-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorGreen and sustainable remediation-
Appears in Collections:
KIST Article > 2014
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Export
RIS (EndNote)
XLS (Excel)
XML

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

BROWSE