Comparison of electrical conductivity data obtained by four-electrode and four-point probe methods for graphite-based polymer composites
- Authors
- Mironov, V. S.; Kim, J. K.; Park, M.; Lim, S.; Cho, W. K.
- Issue Date
- 2007-06
- Publisher
- ELSEVIER SCI LTD
- Citation
- POLYMER TESTING, v.26, no.4, pp.547 - 555
- Abstract
- A comparison of the volume conductivity measured by standard four-electrode (FE) and four-point probe (FPP) methods for graphite-based powdery polypropylene (PP) and poly(vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF) composite bar specimens was made in this study. Significant difference in the conductivity data obtained by standard FE and FPP methods was found for highly conductive PP and PVDF composites which were molded from hybrid carbon/polymer powders dry-blended in a high-speed mixer and jar ball mill. However, it was found that the conductivity values were approximately equal for moderately conductive PVDF/graphite and PP/graphite composites. It was also shown that polishing the specimens to remove 100-150 mu m of the surface layer and decrease surface roughness did not bring about significant changes in conductivity values. Consequently, bulk non-uniformity and inhomogeneity of graphite-based polymer material were considered to be the most probable sources of the difference in the volume conductivity values measured by the FE and FPP methods. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
- Keywords
- graphite filler; polymer composite; volume electrical conductivity; four-electrode method; four-point probe method; experimental measurement
- ISSN
- 0142-9418
- URI
- https://pubs.kist.re.kr/handle/201004/134359
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2007.02.003
- Appears in Collections:
- KIST Article > 2007
- Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
- Export
- RIS (EndNote)
- XLS (Excel)
- XML
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.