Full metadata record

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorHong, Seongjin-
dc.contributor.authorRehman, Junaid ur-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Yong-Su-
dc.contributor.authorCho, Young Wook-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Seung-Woo-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Su-Yong-
dc.contributor.authorLim, Hyang-Tag-
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-19T11:30:27Z-
dc.date.available2024-01-19T11:30:27Z-
dc.date.created2022-07-21-
dc.date.issued2022-09-
dc.identifier.issn1863-8880-
dc.identifier.urihttps://pubs.kist.re.kr/handle/201004/114739-
dc.description.abstractQuantum enhanced multiple phase estimation is essential for various applications in quantum sensors and imaging. For multiple phase estimation, the sensitivity enhancement is dependent on both quantum probe states and measurement. It is known that multi-mode N00N$N00N$ states can outperform other probe states for estimating multiple phases. However, it is generally not feasible in practice to implement an optimal measurement to achieve the quantum Cramer-Rao bound (QCRB) under a practical measurement scheme using a multi-mode beam splitter in interferometric phase estimation. Here, a strategy to achieve the best practical sensitivity by optimizing both mode-amplitudes of multi-mode N00N$N00N$ states and a split ratio of a multi-mode beam splitter is investigated. Then, it is experimentally demonstrated that the best sensitivity is achieved when an amplitude-balanced multi-mode N00N$N00N$ state and a multi-mode beam splitter with an unbalanced ratio are used in three-mode interferometric phase estimation. The results show that the lower QCRB cannot guarantee better sensitivity under a practical measurement scheme, thus it is more desirable to enhance the practical sensitivity rather than the QCRB. It is believed that this strategy can provide a powerful tool for practical applications in multiple phase estimation.-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.publisherWiley - VCH Verlag GmbH & CO. KGaA-
dc.titlePractical Sensitivity Bound for Multiple Phase Estimation with Multi-Mode N00N States-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/lpor.202100682-
dc.description.journalClass1-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationLaser and Photonics Reviews, v.16, no.9-
dc.citation.titleLaser and Photonics Reviews-
dc.citation.volume16-
dc.citation.number9-
dc.description.isOpenAccessN-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscie-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscopus-
dc.identifier.wosid000824120100001-
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategoryOptics-
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategoryPhysics, Applied-
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategoryPhysics, Condensed Matter-
dc.relation.journalResearchAreaOptics-
dc.relation.journalResearchAreaPhysics-
dc.type.docTypeArticle; Early Access-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorquantum metrology-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorquantum optics-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorquantum sensors-
Appears in Collections:
KIST Article > 2022
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Export
RIS (EndNote)
XLS (Excel)
XML

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

BROWSE