Full metadata record

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorLee, Seung Min-
dc.contributor.authorYum, Jung Hwan-
dc.contributor.authorLarsen, Eric S.-
dc.contributor.authorShervin, Shahab-
dc.contributor.authorWang, Weijie-
dc.contributor.authorRyou, Jae-Hyun-
dc.contributor.authorBielawski, Christopher W.-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Woo Chul-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Seong Keun-
dc.contributor.authorOh, Jungwoo-
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-19T20:01:19Z-
dc.date.available2024-01-19T20:01:19Z-
dc.date.created2021-09-02-
dc.date.issued2019-06-
dc.identifier.issn0002-7820-
dc.identifier.urihttps://pubs.kist.re.kr/handle/201004/119922-
dc.description.abstractWe demonstrated the growth of wurtzite-crystalline beryllium oxide (BeO) thin films on GaN and ZnO substrates using atomic layer deposition (ALD). Single-crystalline BeO were epitaxially grown on GaN. Despite the inherently large lattice mismatch of BeO and GaN atoms, the 6/5 and 7/6 domain-matched structures dramatically reduced the residual strain in BeO thin films. On the other hand, the lattice mismatch of BeO and ZnO was not effectively accommodated in the mixed domains. X-ray diffraction (XRD) confirmed the in-plane crystallization of BeO-on-substrates in the (002){102}(BeO)||(002){102}(Sub) orientation and relaxation degrees of 20.8% (GaN), 100% (ZnO). The theoretical critical thicknesses of BeO for strain relaxation were 2.2 m (GaN) and 1.6 nm (ZnO), calculated using a total film energy model. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and Fourier-filtered imaging supported the bonding configuration and crystallinity of wurtzite BeO thin films on GaN and ZnO substrates.-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.publisherWILEY-
dc.subjectTHERMAL-CONDUCTIVITY-
dc.subjectGROWTH-
dc.subjectDEFECTS-
dc.subjectLAYER-
dc.subjectOXIDES-
dc.subjectSIZE-
dc.titleDomain epitaxy of crystalline BeO films on GaN and ZnO substrates-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/jace.16198-
dc.description.journalClass1-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationJOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CERAMIC SOCIETY, v.102, no.6, pp.3745 - 3752-
dc.citation.titleJOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CERAMIC SOCIETY-
dc.citation.volume102-
dc.citation.number6-
dc.citation.startPage3745-
dc.citation.endPage3752-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscie-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscopus-
dc.identifier.wosid000465347700069-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85058158959-
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategoryMaterials Science, Ceramics-
dc.relation.journalResearchAreaMaterials Science-
dc.type.docTypeArticle-
dc.subject.keywordPlusTHERMAL-CONDUCTIVITY-
dc.subject.keywordPlusGROWTH-
dc.subject.keywordPlusDEFECTS-
dc.subject.keywordPlusLAYER-
dc.subject.keywordPlusOXIDES-
dc.subject.keywordPlusSIZE-
dc.subject.keywordAuthoratomic-layer deposition-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorberyllium oxide-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorcritical thickness-
dc.subject.keywordAuthordomain-matching epitaxy-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorgallium nitride-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorzinc oxide-
Appears in Collections:
KIST Article > 2019
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Export
RIS (EndNote)
XLS (Excel)
XML

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

BROWSE