Full metadata record

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorYu, Youngbeom-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Seockheon-
dc.contributor.authorMaeng, Sung Kyu-
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-20T01:30:43Z-
dc.date.available2024-01-20T01:30:43Z-
dc.date.created2022-01-25-
dc.date.issued2017-06-
dc.identifier.issn2220-1319-
dc.identifier.urihttps://pubs.kist.re.kr/handle/201004/122661-
dc.description.abstractMembrane fouling properties and different physical cleaning methods for forward osmosis (FO) and reverse osmosis (RO) laboratory-scale filtration systems were investigated. The membrane fouling, with respect to flux reduction, was lower in FO than in RO when testing an activated sludge effluent. Cross-flow velocity, air-scouring, osmotic backwashing and effect of a spacer were compared to determine the most effective cleaning method for FO. After a long period of fouling with activated sludge, the flux was fully recovered in a short period of osmotic backwashing compared with cleaning by changing cross-flow velocity and air-scouring. In this study, the osmotic backwashing was found to be the most efficient way to clean the FO membrane. The amount of RNA recovered from FO membranes was about twice that for RO membranes; biofouling could be more significant in FO than in RO. However, the membrane fouling in FO was lower than that in RO. The spacer increased the flux in FO with activated sludge liquor suspended solids of 2,500 mg/L, and there were effects of spacer on performance of FO-MBR membrane fouling. However, further studies are required to determine how the spacer geometry influences on the performance of the FO membrane.-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.publisherIWA PUBLISHING-
dc.titleForward osmosis membrane fouling and cleaning for wastewater reuse-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.2166/wrd.2016.023-
dc.description.journalClass1-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationJOURNAL OF WATER REUSE AND DESALINATION, v.7, no.2, pp.111 - 120-
dc.citation.titleJOURNAL OF WATER REUSE AND DESALINATION-
dc.citation.volume7-
dc.citation.number2-
dc.citation.startPage111-
dc.citation.endPage120-
dc.description.isOpenAccessN-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscie-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscopus-
dc.identifier.wosid000400139700001-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85018366498-
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategoryEngineering, Environmental-
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategoryWater Resources-
dc.relation.journalResearchAreaEngineering-
dc.relation.journalResearchAreaWater Resources-
dc.type.docTypeArticle-
dc.subject.keywordPlusAMMONIA-CARBON DIOXIDE-
dc.subject.keywordPlusREVERSE-OSMOSIS-
dc.subject.keywordPlusNANOFILTRATION MEMBRANES-
dc.subject.keywordPlusORGANIC-MATTER-
dc.subject.keywordPlusCONTACTOR PROCESSES-
dc.subject.keywordPlusPROCESS PERFORMANCE-
dc.subject.keywordPlusPHYSICAL ASPECTS-
dc.subject.keywordPlusPART I-
dc.subject.keywordPlusMECHANISMS-
dc.subject.keywordPlusPRETREATMENT-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorair-scouring-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorcross-flow velocity-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorforward osmosis-
dc.subject.keywordAuthormembrane fouling-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorosmotic backwashing-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorspacer-
Appears in Collections:
KIST Article > 2017
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Export
RIS (EndNote)
XLS (Excel)
XML

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

BROWSE