Full metadata record

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorLee, K. -S.-
dc.contributor.authorHan, H. -S.-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Y. -C.-
dc.contributor.authorLo Han, J. H.-
dc.contributor.authorH-Seung, R.-
dc.contributor.authorLee, H. -S.-
dc.contributor.authorChang, J. -S.-
dc.contributor.authorLee, D. -H.-
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-20T08:00:38Z-
dc.date.available2024-01-20T08:00:38Z-
dc.date.created2021-09-04-
dc.date.issued2015-02-
dc.identifier.issn1432-8917-
dc.identifier.urihttps://pubs.kist.re.kr/handle/201004/125829-
dc.description.abstractThe osteoconduction of porous bodies made of two kinds of calcium phosphate compounds was investigated by performing single level posterolateral spinal fusions on 20 New Zealand white rabbits. The animals were divided into two groups and implanted with bone graft substitute made of hydroxyapatite (HA) and beta-calcium pyrophosphate (beta-CPP) respectively. All animals were sacrificed after 12 weeks of surgery, and the fused bone masses were evaluated using manual palpation, uniaxial tensile strength measurement and histological evaluation. Fusion ratios and mean tensile strengths were similar for both beta-CPP and HA group. Light and scanning electron microscopy showed new bone growth into the pores, which was abundant in the both beta-CPP and HA group. However, the pore size of the beta-CPP implant was larger than that of HA, and faster bone growth was observed as beta-CPP was absorbed into the host's body. In conclusion, porous beta-CPP implants showed more desirable bone graft substitute characteristics due to their satisfactory osteoconductive ability and better biodegradation compared to porous HA implants.-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.publisherMANEY PUBLISHING-
dc.subjectCERAMIC COMPOSITION-
dc.subjectPHOSPHATE CERAMICS-
dc.subjectIN-VITRO-
dc.subjectHYDROXYAPATITE-
dc.subjectBEHAVIOR-
dc.subjectINTERFACE-
dc.subjectINGROWTH-
dc.titleEvaluation of porous beta-calcium pyrophosphate as bioresorbable bone graft substitute material-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1179/1433075X14Y.0000000215-
dc.description.journalClass1-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationMATERIALS RESEARCH INNOVATIONS, v.19, no.2, pp.86 - 90-
dc.citation.titleMATERIALS RESEARCH INNOVATIONS-
dc.citation.volume19-
dc.citation.number2-
dc.citation.startPage86-
dc.citation.endPage90-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscie-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscopus-
dc.identifier.wosid000349114500002-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-84920442237-
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategoryMaterials Science, Multidisciplinary-
dc.relation.journalResearchAreaMaterials Science-
dc.type.docTypeArticle-
dc.subject.keywordPlusCERAMIC COMPOSITION-
dc.subject.keywordPlusPHOSPHATE CERAMICS-
dc.subject.keywordPlusIN-VITRO-
dc.subject.keywordPlusHYDROXYAPATITE-
dc.subject.keywordPlusBEHAVIOR-
dc.subject.keywordPlusINTERFACE-
dc.subject.keywordPlusINGROWTH-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorCalcium phosphate-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorBone graft-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorBioresorption-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorOsteoconduction-
Appears in Collections:
KIST Article > 2015
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Export
RIS (EndNote)
XLS (Excel)
XML

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

BROWSE