Enhanced Optogenetic Stimulation of Retinal Ganglion Cells With Assistive Electric Stimulation for Low Optical Power Artificial Vision

Authors
Roh, HyeonheeKang, JoonghoonLee, Hyung-MinIm, Maesoon
Issue Date
2025-05
Publisher
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers
Citation
IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, v.33, pp.1958 - 1968
Abstract
High optical power of optogenetic stimulation may cause phototoxicity during chronic application. To lower the optical power, a hybrid approach which combines optogenetic and electric modalities has been proposed. However, the hybrid stimulation effect has not been well studied in the retina, which would be an ideal target of optogenetic intervention for sight restoration. Here, we investigated the assistive effect of electric pulses while optogenetic stimulation in both wild-type (wt) and retinal degeneration 10 (rd10) mouse retinas. We injected AAV2-CAG-ChR2(H134R)-EGFP into the 4-week-old mouse eyeballs. After > 4 weeks, spiking activities of retinal ganglion cells of ex-vivo retinas were recorded using a cell-attached patch clamping in response to hybrid stimulation: 3 light intensities (i.e., Levels 1, 2, and 3) for optogenetic stimulation and 3 types of assistive electric pulses (i.e., -5 and-10 mu A square pulses, and-20 mu A increasing ramping current) were tested. Notably, in wt retina, the hybrid stimulation with-10 mu A square pulse evoked significantly more spikes compared to the optogeneticonly case, showing average increases of 1.89 +/- 2.34, 2.49 +/- 1.92, and 2.50 +/- 1.61 spikes for the Levels 1, 2 and 3, respectively. For the same conditions, spiking latencies were reduced by 35.27 +/- 41.34, 10.62 +/- 13.73, and 8.64 +/- 15.33 ms. These results demonstrate hybrid stimulation can enhance spiking magnitude and reduce temporal delay. Also, our results indicate assistive electric pulse is more effective for lower power optogenetic stimulation than higher one but the assistive effect was reduced in rd10 retinas. Our study suggests hybrid stimulation holds promise for enhancing chronic applicability of optogenetic approaches for vision restoration by lengthening battery life through the reduced optical power requirement.
Keywords
ACTIVATION; LIGHT; EXPRESSION; RESPONSES; Retina; Optogenetics; Vectors; Stimulated emission; Optical pulses; Neurons; Mice; Light emitting diodes; Animals; Microscopy; Artificial vision; retinal prosthesis; hybrid stimulation; optogenetic stimulation; electric stimulation
ISSN
1534-4320
URI
https://pubs.kist.re.kr/handle/201004/152553
DOI
10.1109/TNSRE.2025.3568864
Appears in Collections:
KIST Article > Others
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Export
RIS (EndNote)
XLS (Excel)
XML

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

BROWSE